Coates v. Discount Tire Company of Nebraska, Inc.
| 8:2020cv00139 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Discount Tire's Motion for Summary Judgment, Filing 49 , is granted; Coates's Complaint, Filing [1-1], is dismissed; and The Court will enter a separate judgment. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
43
AMENDED CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - 42 The Joint Motion to Amend Case Progression Order is granted and the case progression order is amended as follows: A planning conference to discuss case progression, dispositive motions, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on May 28, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. by telephone. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
12
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coates v. Discount Tire Company of Nebraska, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
