Walton v. Myer et al
| John K. Walton |
| Captain West, Sgt. Moss, Michael Myer, Co. II Geno, Lt. Swecrck, Co. II McNeil, Store Clerk for DCCC, Co. II Jackson, Co. II Gillespie and Betsy Brown |
| 8:2020cv00155 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff will have 30 days to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. In the absence of cause shown, this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 13, 2020: check for response to show cause order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. #2 ) is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $15.79 within 30 days, unless the court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the court. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiffs institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 5, 2020: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party & plaintiff's institution; e-mailed to finance)(LKO)
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff John K. Walton. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Douglas County Corrections. (LKO) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff John K. Walton. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Betsy Brown, Geno, Gillespie, Jackson, McNeil, Moss, Michael Myer, Store Clerk for DCCC, Swecrck, and West filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff John K. Walton. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
