Ortega v. Frakes
| Rodrigo A. Ortega |
| Scott R. Frakes |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2020cv00209 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the amended habeas corpus petition (Filing No. #15 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By August 24, 2020, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 24, 2020: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 23, 2020: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The Clerk of Court shall term the deadlines set forth in Filing no. #11 . Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Austin N. Relph on behalf of Respondent Scott R. Frakes (Relph, Austin) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER that that Petitioner's motion to amend (Filing no. #14 ) is granted. Filing no. #15 becomes the operative petition. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 15 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Petition on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER - that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing no. #12 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Reconsider Appointment of Counsel on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition (Filing No. #1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By July 31, 2020, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 31, 2020: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If the motion for summary judgment is denied, Respondent must file an answer, a designation and a brief that complies with terms of this order. (See the following paragraph.) The documents must be filed no later than 30 days after the denial of the motion for summary judgment. Respondent is warned that failure to file an answer, a designation and a brief in a timely fashion may result in the imposition of sanctions, including Petitioner's release. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 31, 2020: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. #6 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 10 LETTER on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Rodrigo A. Ortega on 06/15/2020. Receipt number 8056532, in the amount of $ 5.00. (LRM) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's request to proceed IFP (Filing No. #3 ) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 8, 2020: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Service on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF in support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 on behalf of Petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Rodrigo A. Ortega. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
