Stanko v. Sheridan County et al
| Rudy Stanko |
| Mark Overman, Aaron Conn, Sheridan County and Jeff Brewer |
| 8:2020cv00294 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for summons on behalf of Plaintiff Rudy Stanko. (Copy of front page only received stamped and mailed back to plaintiff)(TCL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Recusal Of Judge Richard G Kopf on behalf of Plaintiff Rudy Stanko.(TCL) |
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Jeff Brewer, Aaron Conn, Mark Overman, Sheridan County. No Summons issued, with receipt number 8056989, in the amount of $ 400.00 filed on behalf of plaintiff Rudy Stanko. (TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
