Seebold v. Improved Data Services, LLC
| Harry M. Seebold, III and Harry Seebold |
| Improved Data Services, LLC |
| 8:2020cv00368 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
PROTECTIVE ORDER - Upon consideration of the parties' joint request for entry of a Protective Order in their Rule 26(f) Meeting Report, (Filing No. #10 ), the Court enters the following Protective Order governing the disclosure of confidential Discovery Material by a Producing Party to a Receiving Party in this Action. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 12
CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 5/3/21. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A planning conference to discuss case progression, dispositive motions, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on May 17, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Joshua A. Mize on behalf of Plaintiff Harry Seebold.(Mize, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Joshua A. Mize on behalf of Plaintiff Harry Seebold.(Mize, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Advanced Analytics, Inc. for Improved Data Services, LLC. by Attorney Brendan H. Little on behalf of Defendants Improved Data Services, LLC, Advanced Analytics, Inc..(Little, Brendan) |
|
Filing 7
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 11/6/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Improved Data Services, LLC (Little, Brendan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Improved Data Services, LLC. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (Mize, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Improved Data Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4236478), by Attorney Joshua A. Mize on behalf of Harry M. Seebold, III (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Mize, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
