Terry v. United States of America
Petitioner: Rose Marie Tatum Terry
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 8:2020cv00386
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Referring Judge: Richard G Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Filing 18 COPY of Order from USCA - 8th Circuit [20-3339] - If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (MKR)
November 6, 2020 Filing 17 Letter by Clerk from USCA-8th Circuit [20-3339] regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA, #12 . (Attachments: #1 Pro se Notice of Docket Activity)(MKR)
November 5, 2020 Filing 16 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by Clerk to USCA regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA, #12 , Judgment - Pro Se, #8 , and Order #15 . Notice of Appeal filed on 11/05/2020 by Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. (LAC)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that Petitioner may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on her two Notices of Appeal (Filings #11 and #12 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Reopen (Filing #9 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
November 5, 2020 Filing 13 COPY OF IFP MEMO prepared by Deputy Clerk and sent to Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA, #12 as to Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. (LAC)
November 5, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL regarding Judgment - Pro Se, #8 on behalf of Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. Copy of notice of appeal mailed to petitioner at CJ-DOUGLAS, Douglas County Correctional Center, 710 South 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102. (LAC)
October 29, 2020 Filing 11 CORRESPONDENCE on behalf of Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry.(LAC)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that that Respondent shall file a response to Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Case (Filing #9 ) on or before November 18, 2020. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
October 26, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Reopen on behalf of Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. (LAC)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT - PRO SE - IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (and any amendments or supplements thereto) is denied and dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Filing #1 ) is denied and dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing #2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
October 8, 2020 Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LAC)
September 29, 2020 Filing 4 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter mailed to Douglas County Corrections. (LKO)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (JAB)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Rose Marie Tatum Terry. (JAB)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rose Marie Tatum Terry. (JAB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terry v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rose Marie Tatum Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?