Griffin v. County Prosecutor
Plaintiff: Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant: County Prosecutor
Case Number: 8:2020cv00388
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Referring Judge: Richard G Kopf
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 JUDGMENT - PRO SE pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order #16 . Judgment is entered providing that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised that any notice of appeal must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Plaintiff will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's orders and failure to pay the court's filing and administrative fees or to show cause why Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
October 23, 2020 Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr.. (LKO)
October 22, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr.. (LKO)
October 22, 2020 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant County Prosecutor filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr. (LKO)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: As previously ordered, Plaintiff has until October 29, 2020, to make a good cause showing or else to pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees. In the absence of either action by Plaintiff, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff's motion to engage in discovery (Filing #10 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
October 15, 2020 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Memorandum and Order #7 . on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr.(MKR)
October 15, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION to Engage in Discovery on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr. (MKR)
October 8, 2020 Filing 9 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO)
October 2, 2020 Filing 8 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (TCL)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to show cause why the three cases referenced above should not be considered strikes against him per the terms of the PLRA, and why he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). In the alternative, Plaintiff may pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days. In the absence of either action by Plaintiff, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: October 29, 2020: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause or pay fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Douglas County Corrections. (LKO)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
September 29, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
September 28, 2020 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr.. (LKO)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr.. (LKO)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County Prosecutor filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Arthur James Griffin, Jr. (LKO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffin v. County Prosecutor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County Prosecutor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?