Harvey v. Myers
| Rustin C. Harvey |
| Michael Myers |
| 8:2020cv00411 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petitioner's motion for return of documents (filing #10 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Return of Documents on behalf of Petitioner Rustin C. Harvey. (LKO) |
|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order entered this date, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The petition for writ of habeas corpus (filing #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. Petitioner's pending motion for a preliminary injunction (filing #6 ) is denied as moot. The court will enter judgment by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing #2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on behalf of Petitioner Rustin C. Harvey. (LKO) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Rustin C. Harvey. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LAC) |
| Filing 4 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Candice Gaines at Douglas County Corrections. (LAC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se petitioner) (LAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Rustin C. Harvey.(LAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by pro se petitioner Rustin C. Harvey. (LAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harvey v. Myers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rustin C. Harvey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Myers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
