Walls v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Incorporated
Plaintiff: Christopher Walls
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Incorporated and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 8:2020cv00413
Filed: October 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Susan M Bazis
Referring Judge: Brian C Buescher
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 09/03/2021. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A status conference to discuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge by telephone on June 17, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (Filing No. #11 .) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRM)
November 30, 2020 Filing 17 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Initial Disclosures by Attorney William M. Lamson, Jr. on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Lamson, William)
November 23, 2020 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LRM)
November 23, 2020 Filing 15 STIPULATION as to Remote Deposition Procedures by Attorney Randal W. LeNeave on behalf of Plaintiff Christopher Walls.(LeNeave, Randal)
November 23, 2020 Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Randal W. LeNeave on behalf of Plaintiff Christopher Walls.(LeNeave, Randal)
November 18, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff, Set One by Attorney William M. Lamson, Jr. on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Lamson, William)
November 18, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories to Plaintiff, Set One by Attorney William M. Lamson, Jr. on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Lamson, William)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (ADB)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 12/7/2020.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (ADB)
November 5, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney William M. Lamson, Jr. on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Lamson, William)
November 5, 2020 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Daniel Hassing on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Hassing, Daniel)
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Attorney Daniel Hassing on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Hassing, Daniel)
November 5, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Hassing, Daniel)
October 15, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company on 10/15/2020. (LeNeave, Randal)
October 14, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM)
October 14, 2020 Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
October 12, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (LeNeave, Randal)
October 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Company, Incorporated ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4256385), by Attorney Randal W. LeNeave on behalf of Christopher Walls (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LeNeave, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walls v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Daniel Hassing
Represented By: William M. Lamson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Walls
Represented By: Randal W. LeNeave
Represented By: Jayson D. Nelson
Represented By: Paul A. Banker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?