Holloway v. Fahey et al
Plaintiff: Walter H. Holloway
Defendant: Mark Lloyd, Mike Fahey and Verizon, AT&T, TracPhone, Boost, T-Mobile
Case Number: 8:2020cv00490
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Referring Judge: Richard G Kopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT - PRO SE - JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2021: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) (LAC).
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered by separate document.Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
December 17, 2020 Filing 8 TEXT STRIKE ORDER that Pursuant to NEGenR 1.3(a)(4), the Memorandum and Order, #7 is stricken for the following reason(s): document filed in incorrect case. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LAC)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STRICKEN - MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) Modified on 12/17/2020 to strike per #8 Order(LAC).
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the filing restrictions set forth above are imposed in this court as of the date of this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing 2) is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within 21 days from the date of this order why this court should not impose the filing restrictions listed above. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (SLP)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
November 20, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
November 20, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO)
November 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Foley, Mark Lloyd, and Verizon, AT&T, TracPhone, Boost, T-Mobile filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Walter H. Holloway. (LKO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holloway v. Fahey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Fahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon, AT&T, TracPhone, Boost, T-Mobile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter H. Holloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?