Patton v. Frakes et al
| Marqus Patton |
| Scott Frakes, Todd Wasmer and Doug Peterson |
| 8:2020cv00504 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 BRIEF in support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Attorney Ann O. Petersen on behalf of Petitioner Marqus Patton.(Petersen, Ann) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Thomas C. Riley regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 . E-mail resent to Thomas.riley@douglascounty-ne.gov. (MKR) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANEDC-4295621), by Attorney Ann O. Petersen on behalf of Marqus Patton (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Petersen, Ann) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
