McCray v. Frakes
Samuel McCray |
State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2021cv00007 |
January 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 MOTION to Substitute Party by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent State of Nebraska.(Tangeman, Erin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Erin E. Tangeman on behalf of Respondent State of Nebraska (Tangeman, Erin) |
|
FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Petitioner Samuel McCray. Receipt number 8059034, in the amount of $ 5.00. (LRM) |
|
Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Samuel McCray. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter mailed to Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. (LKO) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Samuel McCray. (LKO) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Samuel McCray. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.