Mustafic v. Preferred Cartage Service et al
| Mustafa Mustafic |
| Justin W Brice and Justin Brice |
| Preferred Cartage Service |
| R&T Trucking, LLC |
| 8:2021cv00063 |
| February 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1364 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Defendants by Attorney Katherine A. McNamara on behalf of Defendant Preferred Cartage Service.(McNamara, Katherine) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Preferred Garden City defendant Preferred Cartage Service. (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 14 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand and Counter-Claim , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Mustafa Mustafic regarding Complaint, #1 filed by Mustafa Mustafic by Justin Brice, Preferred Cartage Service (McNamara, Katherine) |
| Filing 13 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Preferred Cartage Service. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
|
|
| Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Katherine A. McNamara on behalf of Defendants Justin Brice, Preferred Cartage Service.(McNamara, Katherine) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Preferred Cartage, Colorado defendant Preferred Cartage Service on 3/1/2021. (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Justin Brice defendant Justin Brice on 2/27/2021. (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to defendants Justin Brice and Preferred Cartage Service. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 7 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 5 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Defendant Preferred regarding Complaint, #1 . (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Defendant Preferred regarding Complaint, #1 . (Salerno, Terrence) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand Complaint against Justin W Brice, Preferred Cartage Service, Preferred Cartage Service ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNEDC-4342524), by Attorney Terrence J. Salerno on behalf of Mustafa Mustafic(Salerno, Terrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.