Coleman v. Lincoln Police Department et al
Jeremiah Coleman |
Lincoln Police Department, Steven, Jenkins, Stephanie, Lancaster County Adult Correctional Facility, Lincoln Police Officers,, Mental Health of the Lancaster County Adult Correctional Facility, Lincoln, NE. Walmart Super Center and Walmart employees |
8:2021cv00069 |
February 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss on behalf of Plaintiff Jeremiah Coleman.(LKO) |
|
Filing 6 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. (MKR) |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
Filing 3 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Jeremiah Coleman. (MKR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and to Waive initial filing fee on behalf of Plaintiff Jeremiah Coleman. (MKR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jenkins, Lancaster County Adult Correctional Facility, Lincoln Police Department, Lincoln Police Officers,, Lincoln, NE. Walmart Super Center, Mental Health of the Lancaster County Adult Correctional Facility, Stephanie, Steven and Walmart employees. No Summons issued, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jeremiah Coleman. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.