Koltes v. The Auto Club Group
Mr. David R. Koltes and David Koltes |
dba AAA Nebraska The Auto Club Group and The Auto Club Group a Nebraska Non Profit corporation doing business as AAA Nebraska |
8:2021cv00203 |
May 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Susan M Bazis |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Serving Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures by Attorney Terry A. White on behalf of Plaintiff David Koltes (White, Terry) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures by Attorney Rhianna A. Kittrell on behalf of Defendant The Auto Club Group (Kittrell, Rhianna) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LRM) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting - Settlement Likely by Attorney Terry A. White on behalf of Plaintiff David Koltes.(White, Terry) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Patrick J. Barrett on behalf of Defendant The Auto Club Group.(Barrett, Patrick) |
Filing 8 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant The Auto Club Group. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 7/29/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRM) |
Filing 6 RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by The Auto Club Group (Barrett, Patrick) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant The Auto Club Group. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (White, Terry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against David R. Koltes ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4408886), by Attorney Terry A. White on behalf of David R. Koltes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(White, Terry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.