Laushman v. Douglas County Correction
| Donald Laushman |
| Douglas County Correction |
| 8:2021cv00223 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT - PRO SE : This case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is hereby notified that the filing of a notice of appeal will make him liable for payment of the full $505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This matter is before the court on its own motion. Plaintiff was advised on June 23 and July 13, 2021, (Filings 6 & 7) that his Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing 5) was considered deficient because the document was not signed. Plaintiff was twice ordered to correct the deficiency and warned that failure to do so may result in dismissal of this matter. Plaintiff has failed to correct the deficiency. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is dismissed without prejudice, and judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect on or before July 28, 2021. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 28, 2021deadline for submission of a signed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. No further review of this case shall take place until Plaintiff complies with this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 6 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #5 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(TCL) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Donald Laushman. (TCL) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 15, 2021: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LRM)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LRM)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas County Correction filed on behalf of Donald Laushman. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Laushman v. Douglas County Correction | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald Laushman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Douglas County Correction | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
