Breakfield v. Crossmark, Inc.
Otis Breakfield |
CROSSMARK, Inc. |
8:2021cv00228 |
June 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Robert F Rossiter |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 3/11/22. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A status conference to discuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on March 22, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Ari D. Riekes on behalf of Plaintiff Otis Breakfield.(Riekes, Ari) |
Filing 6 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 7/26/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Crossmark, Inc. (Zwisler, David) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Other Affiliate CM Acquisition for CROSSMARK, Inc.. by Attorney David L. Zwisler on behalf of Defendants CROSSMARK, Inc., CM Acquisition.(Zwisler, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against CROSSMARK, Inc. from District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number CI-21-5278 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4419094) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney David L. Zwisler on behalf of CROSSMARK, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court File, #3 Exhibit B - SOS Business Search)(Zwisler, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Breakfield v. Crossmark, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Otis Breakfield | |
Represented By: | Ari D. Riekes |
Represented By: | Jeffrey P. Welch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CROSSMARK, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Abigail S. Wallach |
Represented By: | David L. Zwisler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.