Widtfeldt v. Whitfield et al
| James Widtfeldt |
| James Daugherty, Christopher Suenram and Deborah Whitfield |
| 8:2021cv00239 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT - PRO SE. In accordance with the Order entered today (Filing No. #7 ), judgment is entered in favor of defendants Deborah Whitfield, James Daugherty, and Christopher Suenram and against James Widtfeldt. This case is dismissed with prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER that defendants Deborah Whitfield, James Daugherty, and Christopher Suenram's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 3 in Case No. 8:21CV239) is granted. Defendant the United States's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 3 in Case No. 8:21CV275) is granted. Defendant United States's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 3 in Case No. 8:21CV276) is granted. Defendants Deborah Whitfield's and Christopher Suenram's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 3 in Case No. 8:21CV277) is granted. Plaintiff James Widtfeldt's Complaints (Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:21CV239, Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:21CV275, Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:21CV276, and Filing No. 1 in Case No. 8:21CV277) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own fees, costs, and expenses. A separate judgment will issue in each case. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing 6
REASSIGNMENT ORDER This case is related to case no. 8:18-cv-453. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B), IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and to Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Jurisdiction #3 by Attorney Christopher F. Suenram on behalf of Defendants James Daugherty, Christopher Suenram, Deborah Whitfield.(Suenram, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Jurisdiction by Attorney Christopher F. Suenram on behalf of Defendants James Daugherty, Christopher Suenram, Deborah Whitfield.(Suenram, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION by Attorney Christopher F. Suenram on behalf of Defendants James Daugherty, Christopher Suenram, Deborah Whitfield.(Suenram, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against James Widtfeldt from District Court of Holt County, Nebraska, Case number CI 21-96 with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Christopher F. Suenram on behalf of Christopher Suenram, James Daugherty, Deborah Whitfield (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint and Exhibits)(Suenram, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
