Thok v. Garland et al
Merrick Garland, Marcos Charles, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae D. Johnson and Timothy Dunning |
Ruachkuoth Wiyual Thok |
8:2021cv00254 |
July 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Susan M Bazis |
Brian C Buescher |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - This case is related to case no. 8:20-cv-478. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B). This case is reassigned to Senior District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon for disposition and to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANEDC-4433570), by Attorney Jamie L. Arango on behalf of Ruachkuoth Wiyual Thok (Arango, Jamie) Modified on 7/12/2021 to correct petitioner's name (LRM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.