McClain v. Menard, Inc.
Carl McClain |
Menard, Inc. doing business as Mednards and Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards |
Menard, Inc. |
TAG Express, Inc. |
8:2021cv00268 |
July 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant TAG Express, Inc. on 8/13/2021. (Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Order #12 . The deadlines to serve mandatory disclosures and jointly file a Rule 26(f) Report #5 are extended to 14-days after the Third Party Defendant, TAG Express, Inc., files an answer to the Third Party Complaint #8 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (JLM) |
Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Continue Scheduling Order by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to third-party defendant TAG Express, Inc. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (ADB) |
Filing 10 Summons Requested as to TAG Express, Inc. regarding Third Party Complaint #8 . (Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 9 Summons Requested as to TAG Express, Inc. regarding Third Party Complaint #8 . (Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 8 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against TAG Express, Inc., by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Menard, Inc.(Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Karson S. Kampfe on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Kampfe, Karson) |
Filing 6 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 8/23/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Menard, Inc. (Futhey, Robert) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Menard, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Carl McClain from District Court of Sarpy County, Nebraska, Case number 21-1545 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4438743) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Menard, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Futhey, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.