James v. Capps-Wilhelm et al
| Ja'Mario James |
| Michelle Capps-Wilhelm and Scott Frakes |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2021cv00346 |
| September 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing #2 ) is denied as moot. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION on behalf of Petitioner Ja'Mario James. (LKO) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Ja'Mario James. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LKO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Ja'Mario James. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of pro se petitioner Ja'Mario James. (LKO) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Ja'Mario James on 9/3/2021. Receipt number 8061354, in the amount of $ 5.00. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
