Hansen et al v. The United States of America
Plaintiff: Michael Hansen and Elizabeth Hansen
Defendant: The United States of America
Case Number: 8:2021cv00371
Filed: September 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Brian C Buescher
Referring Judge: Michael D Nelson
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice defendant Elizabeth Hansen on 9/24/2021; Michael Hansen on 9/24/2021. (Futhey, Robert)
September 29, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Civil Process Clerk - United States Attorney's Office defendant The United States of America on 9/24/2021. (Futhey, Robert)
September 24, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendants Merrick B. Garland and United States Attorney's Office. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM)
September 24, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Merrick B. Garland regarding Complaint #1 . (Futhey, Robert)
September 24, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Civil Process Clerk regarding Complaint #1 . (Futhey, Robert)
September 24, 2021 Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Kaitlin A. Madsen has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LRM)
September 24, 2021 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
September 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against The United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4482422), by Attorney Robert W. Futhey on behalf of Michael Hansen, Elizabeth Hansen(Futhey, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hansen et al v. The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Hansen
Represented By: Robert W. Futhey
Represented By: Kaitlin A. Madsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Hansen
Represented By: Robert W. Futhey
Represented By: Kaitlin A. Madsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?