Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC v. Houston Specialty Insurance Company
Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC doing business as Honda of Lincoln also known as Rhoden Motor Companies and Rhoden Motor Companies |
Houston Specialty Insurance Company |
8:2021cv00395 |
October 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Robert F Rossiter |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Serving Defendant's Rule 26(A) Initial Disclosures by Attorney Craig A. Knickrehm on behalf of Defendant Houston Specialty Insurance Company (Knickrehm, Craig) |
|
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney John M. Lingelbach on behalf of Plaintiff Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC.(Lingelbach, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Serving Plaintiff's Rule 26(A) Initial Disclosures by Attorney John M. Lingelbach on behalf of Plaintiff Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC (Lingelbach, John) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Attorney John M. Lingelbach on behalf of Plaintiff Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC.(Lingelbach, John) |
|
|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by Houston Specialty Insurance Company (Knickrehm, Craig) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney John M. Lingelbach on behalf of Plaintiff Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC.(Lingelbach, John) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Skyward Specialty Insurance Group for Houston Specialty Insurance Company. by Attorney Craig A. Knickrehm on behalf of Defendants Houston Specialty Insurance Company, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.(Knickrehm, Craig) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Houston Specialty Insurance Company. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC from District Court of Lancaster County, Case number CI 21-3712 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4493784) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Craig A. Knickrehm on behalf of Houston Specialty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Knickrehm, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC v. Houston Specialty Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Motorcars of Lincoln, LLC doing business as Honda of Lincoln also known as Rhoden Motor Companies | |
Represented By: | John M. Lingelbach |
Represented By: | Keith W. Catt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rhoden Motor Companies | |
Represented By: | John M. Lingelbach |
Represented By: | Keith W. Catt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Houston Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Craig A. Knickrehm |
Represented By: | Jonathan M. Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.