Estevez-Martinez v. Unum et al
| Julian Estevez-Martinez |
| Unum and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv00405 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
TEXT ORDER granting #17 Defendants' Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file a reply brief as to the pending motions to dismiss. Defendants' reply shall be filed on or before December 21, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Kathryn E. Jones on behalf of Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc..(Jones, Kathryn) Modified on 12/10/2021 to correct event type (CEW). |
| Filing 16 BRIEF in opposition to Defendants' 12(b) Motion to dismiss by Attorney Jonathan V. Rehm on behalf of Plaintiff Julian Estevez-Martinez.(Rehm, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 15
TEXT ORDER granting #14 Plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend the response deadline as to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing Nos. #9 and #11 ). Plaintiff's brief(s) shall be filed on or before December 7, 2021. Defendants' reply briefs shall be filed in accordance with the Local Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 14 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend by Attorney Jonathan V. Rehm on behalf of Plaintiff Julian Estevez-Martinez.(Rehm, Jonathan) Modified on 11/29/2021 to correct event type (CEW). |
| Filing 13 INDEX in support of Brief #12 In Support of Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Kathryn E. Jones on behalf of Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration and Exhibit A)(Jones, Kathryn) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #11 by Attorney Kathryn E. Jones on behalf of Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc..(Jones, Kathryn) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Kathryn E. Jones on behalf of Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc..(Jones, Kathryn) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #9 by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Unum.(Davidson, Steven) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Unum.(Davidson, Steven) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Unum Group for Unum. by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendants Unum, Unum Group.(Davidson, Steven) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Tyson Foods, Inc. for Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.. by Attorney Kathryn E. Jones on behalf of Defendants Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc..(Jones, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants' answer or response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be served on or before November 9, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
| Filing 5 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Defendant Unum.(Davidson, Steven) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Unum. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(LRM) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Julian Estevez-Martinez from District Court of Dawson County, Nebraska, Case number CI 21-314 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4496082) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Steven D. Davidson on behalf of Unum, Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.(Davidson, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
