Haget v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Deborah Haget and Debrah Haget |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 8:2021cv00440 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER - Per Filing No. 13, Ken Moll is withdrawn as counsel for Plaintiff and will no longer receive electronic notice in this case. The show cause deadline set in Filing No. 12 is terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Ken Moll- Show Cause Order by Attorney Fatima Abuzerr on behalf of Plaintiff Debrah Haget (Abuzerr, Fatima) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - On or before January 11, 2022, Attorney Ken Moll must register for the System and register for admission to practice in this court or show cause by written affidavit why compliance is not possible as required under the rules of the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart.(Copy mailed to attorney) (LKO)
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Boston Scientific Corporation on 11/22/2021. (Welsh, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice #8 for attorney Fatima Abuzerr. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JLS) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of oath of admission by Attorney Fatima Abuzerr on behalf of Plaintiff Debrah Haget (Abuzerr, Fatima) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4525018 by Attorney Fatima Abuzerr on behalf of Plaintiff Debrah Haget.(Abuzerr, Fatima) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendant Boston Scientific Corporation. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested as to regarding Amended Complaint #5 . (Welsh, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with with jury demand against Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation, by Attorney Christopher P. Welsh on behalf of Debrah Haget(Welsh, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Ken Moll has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (ADB) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Fatima Abuzerr has not registered for admittance to practice registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (ADB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Boston Scientific Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNEDC-4521180), by Attorney Christopher P. Welsh on behalf of Deborah Haget(Welsh, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
