Wiese v. Great Western Bank
Michelle Weise and Michelle Wiese |
Great Western Bank |
8:2022cv00015 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Michael D Nelson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 4/4/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Amended Complaint #7 by Great Western Bank (Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. for Great Western Bank. SUPPLEMENTAL CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendants Great Western Bank, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc..(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall have an extension of time to March 4, 2022, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Amended Complaint by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendant Great Western Bank.(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with with jury demand against Defendant Great Western Bank, by Attorney Vincent M. Powers on behalf of Michelle Wiese(Powers, Vincent) |
Filing 6 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint #4 Amended Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendant Great Western Bank.(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 5 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint #4 by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendant Great Western Bank.(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendant Great Western Bank.(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Great Western Bancorp, Inc., Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for Great Western Bank. by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Defendants Great Western Bank, Great Western Bancorp, Inc., BlackRock, Inc..(Ott, Patrice) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Michelle Weise from District Court for Dodge County, Nebraska, Case number CI 21-701 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4555009) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Great Western Bank (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B- Service Return)(Ott, Patrice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.