Johnson v. UNMC et al
| Brent Edward Johnson |
| UNMC, Bellevue Police Dept., Bellevue Fire Dept. and Douglas Co. Court |
| 8:2022cv00032 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order filed this date, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time specified by the court will result in the court dismissing this case without further notice to Plaintiff. In the event Plaintiff files an amended complaint, failure to consolidate all claims into one document may result in the abandonment of claims. Plaintiff is warned that an amended complaint will supersede, not supplement, prior pleadings. The court reserves the right to conduct further review of Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) in the event Plaintiff files an amended complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: March 14, 2022 amended complaint due. The court must be kept informed of Plaintiff's current address at all times while this case is pending. Plaintiff's failure to keep the court so informed may result in dismissal of the case without further notice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Brent Edward Johnson. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Bellevue Fire Dept., Bellevue Police Dept., Douglas Co. Court, and UNMC filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Brent Edward Johnson. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
