Walsh v. Frontline Private Security, L.L.C. et al
| Martin J. Walsh |
| Frontline Private Security, L.L.C. and Magnum Fogelstrom |
| 8:2022cv00037 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| John M Gerrard |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT granting #3 Motion for Judgment. Defendants are enjoined from violating the provisions of Section 7 and 15(a)(2) of the FLSA. Judgment is entered in favor of the Secretary and against Defendants in the total amount of $67,514.04. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Judgment by Attorney Elaine M. Smith on behalf of Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Consent Judgment)(Smith, Elaine) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, by Attorney Elaine M. Smith on behalf of Martin J. Walsh (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Elaine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
