Spung v. Rodriquez
| Gregory L. Spung |
| Joseph Rodriguez and Joseph Paco James Rodriquez |
| 8:2022cv00043 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 INDEX in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #32 , Brief #33 , Index, #34 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Plantiffs response to Defendant's Declaration)(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 39 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #32 , Brief #33 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 38 APPLICATION for Writ Subpoena video records from October 13, 2021 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 37 APPLICATION for Writ Subpoena time records from October 13, 2021 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 36 AFFIDAVIT and INDEX regarding Brief #35 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs email settlement offer, #2 Exhibit Defendant's email rejection of settelment offer, #3 Exhibit mailing demonstrating Counsels other interest, #4 Exhibit mailing demonstrating Counsels other interest)(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 35 BRIEF in opposition to Brief #29 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 34 INDEX in support of MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #32 by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Joseph Rodriquez)(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 33 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #32 by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
Filing 31
TEXT ORDER granting #30 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff shall file a reply brief in support of his Motion for Default Judgment #28 by April 19, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
|
| Filing 30 MOTION for Leave TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 29 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION for Default Judgment against Joseph Paco James Rodriquez #28 by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 28 MOTION for Default Judgment against Joseph Paco James Rodriquez on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The defendant's the defendants motion to dismiss, (Filing No. #10 ) is denied as moot, without prejudice to reassertion. The defendant's motion to strike (Filing No. #21 ) is denied as moot. The plaintiff's motions to amend (Filing Nos. #23 and #24 ) are granted. The plaintiff's second amended complaint (Filing No. #12 ) is deemed filed this date. The defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's second amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. Additionally, the Court is not inclined to entertain any more amended pleadings. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 26 SUPPLEMENT regarding Brief #25 Letter of Termination from Iowa DOL on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 25 BRIEF in support of SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Amend Amended Complaint Document 4 #24 Brief in support of complaint and injunctive relief on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 24 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Amend Amended Complaint Document 4 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 23 FINAL MOTION to Amend To Amended Complaint Document 12 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 22 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Strike and Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss #21 by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Strike and Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 20 Certificate regarding Brief #11 Compliance with NECivR 7.1(d)(3) by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 19 BRIEF in support of Injunctive Relief on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION regarding Supplement #14 Brittanica_Postmodernist_Philosophy on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT To Amended Complaint Document 12 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 STATEMENT To Amended Complaint Document 12 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE regarding MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #10 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT To Amended Complaint Document 12 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT To Amended Complaint Document 12 on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 12 Amended Complaint #4 , Complaint #1 Joseph Paco James Rodriques on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) Modified on 3/8/2022 to reflect this is an amended complaint per SMB chambers(TCL). |
| Filing 11 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #10 by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Attorney Kasey M. Cappellano on behalf of Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez.(Cappellano, Kasey) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Joseph Paco James Rodriques defendant Gregory L. Spung on 2/14/2022. (Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 LETTER Adverse employment act due to defendant's dishonesty on behalf of Plaintiff Gregory L. Spung.(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Joseph Paco James Rodriquez defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez on 2/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Receipt for process service)(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Joseph Paco James Rodriquez defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriquez on 2/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Receipt for process service)(Spung, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 Amended Summons Issued as to defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriguez. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (TCL) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Joseph Paco James Rodriguez filed by pro se plaintiff Gregory L. Spung. (TCL) |
| Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Gregory L. Spung received. Access granted on 2/11/22. (JLS) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendant Joseph Rodriguez regarding Complaint #1 . (Original and 1 copy mailed to plaintiff) (ADB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Rodriguez; 1 Summons issued, with receipt number 8062770, in the amount of $ 402 filed by Gregory L. Spung. (ADB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
