Hennig v. Menard, Inc.
Charity Hennig |
Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards |
8:2022cv00049 |
February 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Michael D Nelson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CASE PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due April 14, 2023. Planning Conference set for 1/17/2023 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MKR) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (ADB) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Andrew D. Weeks on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Weeks, Andrew) |
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE S by Attorney Stephen L. Gerdes on behalf of Plaintiff Charity Hennig.(Gerdes, Stephen) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Service (Defendant's Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures) by Attorney Andrew D. Weeks on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Weeks, Andrew) |
Filing 6 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (TCL) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 3/30/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (TCL) |
Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Menard, Inc. (Weeks, Andrew) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TJM) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Andrew D. Weeks on behalf of Defendant Menard, Inc..(Weeks, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Charity Hennig from Dodge County District Court, Case number CI 22-70 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4576753) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Andrew D. Weeks on behalf of Menard, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Weeks, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hennig v. Menard, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charity Hennig | |
Represented By: | Stephen L. Gerdes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards | |
Represented By: | Andrew D. Weeks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.