Martinez v. Kahl et al
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez |
Larry W. Kahl, Lisa M. Wieble, Stephanie Owens and Diane Schumacher |
8:2022cv00066 |
February 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Prisoner: Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER - The clerk of the court is directed to close this case for statistical purposes. The clerk of the court is directed to file Plaintiff's complaint (filing #1 ) as an amended complaint in case number 8:21CV343. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Larry W. Kahl, Stephanie Owens, Diane Schumacher, Lisa M. Wieble. No Summons issued, filed on behalf of plaintiffAdrian Gutierrez Martinez. (TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.