AC Bluebonnet, LP v. Egan
| AC Bluebonnet, LP and AC Nutrition, LP, a Texas limited partnership |
| Patrick Egan |
| 8:2022cv00081 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Aaron A. Clark on behalf of Defendant Patrick Egan.(Clark, Aaron) |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Extend. Defendant shall have an extension of time to April 13, 2022, to file a brief in reply to the Motion to Dismiss #6 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Extend Time to File Defendant's Reply Brief by Attorney Aaron A. Clark on behalf of Defendant Patrick Egan.(Clark, Aaron) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Plaintiff AC Bluebonnet, LP.(Ott, Patrice) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF MOTION to Dismiss #6 by Attorney Cody E. Brookhouser on behalf of Defendant Patrick Egan.(Brookhouser, Cody) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Attorney Cody E. Brookhouser on behalf of Defendant Patrick Egan.(Brookhouser, Cody) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Standard Nutrition Company for AC Bluebonnet, LP. by Attorney Patrice D. Ott on behalf of Plaintiffs AC Bluebonnet, LP, Standard Nutrition Company.(Ott, Patrice) |
|
Filing 4
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - This case is related to case numbers 8:22CV40 and 8:22CV46. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B), this case is reassigned to Senior District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon for disposition and is assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (LKO)
|
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff AC Bluebonnet, LP. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(ADB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against AC Bluebonnet, LP from District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number CI-22-665 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4586889) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Aaron A. Clark on behalf of Patrick Egan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings)(Clark, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
