Senteney v. Frakes
Petitioner: Larry Senteney
Respondent: Scott Frakes
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 8:2022cv00089
Filed: March 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Referring Judge: Richard G Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing #7 ) is denied as moot. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
March 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Larry Senteney. (LKO)
March 28, 2022 Filing 6 LETTER submitting Filing Fee on behalf of Petitioner Larry Senteney. (LKO)
March 28, 2022 FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Petitioner Larry Senteney. Receipt number 8063218, in the amount of $ 5.00. (ADB)
March 14, 2022 Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Petitioner Larry Senteney. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerks office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/7/2022: check for MIFP or payment) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form AO240)(MKR)
March 7, 2022 Filing 3 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. (MKR)
March 7, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR)
March 7, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of Petitioner Larry Senteney. (MKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Senteney v. Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Senteney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Douglas J. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?