Crown Pointe Townhomes Association v. AmGUARD Insurance Company
Crown Point Townhomes Association |
Amguard Insurance Company |
8:2022cv00108 |
March 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Corporate Parent National Indemnity Company, a Nebraska corporation, Corporate Parent Amguard Insurance Company, Corporate Parent WestGUARD Insurance Company for AmGUARD Insurance Company. by Attorney Matthew B. Reilly on behalf of Defendants AmGUARD Insurance Company, Amguard Insurance Company, WestGUARD Insurance Company, National Indemnity Company, a Nebraska corporation, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc..(Reilly, Matthew) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: At the request of the parties, the deadlines for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #9 and for the parties to file their joint Rule 26(f) report are extended to June 6, 2022. The deadline for Plaintiffs to reply to Defendants response to the Motion to Remand is extended to June 13, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW) |
Filing 10 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Remand #9 by Attorney John L. Spray on behalf of Plaintiff Crown Point Townhomes Association.(Spray, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Attorney John L. Spray on behalf of Plaintiff Crown Point Townhomes Association.(Spray, John) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Jacob C. Garbison, I on behalf of Plaintiff Crown Point Townhomes Association.(Garbison, Jacob) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 5/2/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (JAB) |
Filing 6 RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by AmGUARD Insurance Company (Reilly, Matthew) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant AmGuard Insurance Company. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TCL) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Plaintiff Crown Point Townhomes Association. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TCL) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Crown Point Townhomes Association from Lancaster County District Court, Case number CI 22-226 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4603905) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Matthew B. Reilly on behalf of Amguard Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Reilly, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crown Pointe Townhomes Association v. AmGUARD Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amguard Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Matthew B. Reilly |
Represented By: | Thomas J. Culhane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Crown Point Townhomes Association | |
Represented By: | Jacob C. Garbison, I |
Represented By: | John L. Spray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.