Gomez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Rodolfo Tizol Gomez and Rodolfo Gomez |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 8:2022cv00119 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due March 22, 2023. Status Conference set for 1/26/2023 at 03:00 PM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (MKR)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Serving Plaintiff's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures by Attorney Michael W. Khalili on behalf of Plaintiff Rodolfo Gomez (Khalili, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Serving Defendant's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures by Attorney David C. Mullin on behalf of Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Mullin, David) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (reviewed by both parties) by Attorney Michael Khalili on behalf of Plaintiff Rodolfo Gomez.(Khalili, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 5/13/2022.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (MKR)
|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney David C. Mullin on behalf of Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Mullin, David) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Mullin, David) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(ADB) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Plaintiffs from Douglas County District Court, Case number CI 22-1472 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4610206) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney David C. Mullin on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Mullin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
