Johnson v. City of Omaha et al
Mr. Rodney W. Johnson and Rodney Johnson |
City of Omaha, Matt Kalcevich, Brook Bench, Kari Vasquez and Steven Slater |
8:2022cv00131 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Michael D Nelson |
Robert F Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant City of Omaha on 4/25/2022. (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting in part #15 Unopposed Motion for Early Issuance of Rule 45(a) Subpoena. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1) and the parties' agreement, Plaintiff is given leave to issue a Rule 45 subpoena upon non-party, BMI Janitorial Group, prior to the parties' Rule 26(f) meeting. Defendants shall have 30-days after service of the subpoena to contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to schedule a telephone conference to resolve objections to the subpoena prior to filing a motion to quash. Plaintiff's filing at #14 is stricken as it was filed in error. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Attorney Adam J. Sipple on behalf of Plaintiff Rodney Johnson.(Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 14 STRICKEN - MOTION by Attorney Adam J. Sipple on behalf of Plaintiff Rodney Johnson.(Sipple, Adam) Stricken on 5/6/2022 per Order 16 (JSF). |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants shall have an extension of time to June 16, 2022, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Jeffrey A. Bloom on behalf of Defendants Brook Bench, City of Omaha, Matt Kalcevich, Steven Slater, Kari Vasquez.(Bloom, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Matt Kalcevich on 4/13/2022. (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to defendant City of Omaha. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
Filing 9 Summons Requested as to City of Omaha regarding Complaint #1 . (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Steven Slater on 4/13/2022. (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendants Brook Bench, Matt Kalcevich, Steven Slater, Kari Vasquez. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
Filing 6 Summons Requested as to Brook Bench regarding Complaint #1 . (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Steven Slater regarding Complaint #1 . (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Kari Vasquez regarding Complaint #1 . (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Matt Kalcevich regarding Complaint #1 . (Sipple, Adam) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4614346), by Attorney Adam J. Sipple on behalf of Rodney W. Johnson(Sipple, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.