Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
| Kirk D. Robinson |
| State of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of Corrections, Russell Vanlengen, Kevin Klippert, Kurt Wees and Omaha Correction Center Medical Clinic |
| 8:2022cv00151 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson.(LRM) |
| Filing 7 LETTER regarding filing fee with clerk's response on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson.(JES) |
| Remark - Prisoner Overpayment (Public)- The plaintiff's institution, SPR-OMAHA, Omaha Correctional Center, is notified that an overpayment has been received in this case. The following overpayment was applied to 8:19CV283 and 8:19CV299. The institution is directed to cease collection of payments in this case. (SCR) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Kirk Robinson on 05/20/2022. Receipt number 8063733, in the amount of $ 402.00. (JES) |
| TEXT ENTRY THAT FILING fee paid on behalf of Kirk Robinson on 5/4/2022. Receipt number 8063619, in the amount of $ 402.00. (MKR) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 in fees to the clerk of the court or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: May 31, 2022 Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER regarding filing fee on behalf of Plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (LKO) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: May 20, 2022: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Kevin Klippert, Nebraska Department of Corrections, Omaha Correction Center Medical Clinic, State of Nebraska, Russell Vanlensen, Kurt Wees. No Summons issued, filed on behalf of plaintiff Kirk D. Robinson. (TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
