United States of America v. Liska et al
United States of America |
Duane R Liska and Peggy S Liska |
8:2022cv00161 |
April 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Susan M Bazis |
Robert F Rossiter |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Recovery of Debt to US |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant Peggy S Liska. Waiver sent on 4/28/2022. (Fitzgerald, Mark) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant Duane R Liska. Waiver sent on 4/28/2022. (Fitzgerald, Mark) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Duane R Liska, Peggy S Liska, by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14)(Hook, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.