Lightfeather v. Records Department of Health & Human Services et al
Plaintiff: Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant: Records Department of Health & Human Services, Thresa last name unknown, Tia Anderson, Vital Records of Nebraska, Bryan West Hospital Adult Psychiatric Unit, Doctor Sadiki and Lasting Hope Recovery Center Doctor Sha, M.D.
Case Number: 8:2022cv00235
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 JUDGMENT - PRO SE - This case is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum and Order entered on this date. Any notice of appeal filed by Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Lightfeather will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LKO)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Lightfeather's Motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. #5 ; Filing No. #6 ; Filing No. #11 , are denied. This case is dismissed without prejudice and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Any notice of appeal filed by Lightfeather must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Lightfeather will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
July 29, 2022 Filing 13 RESPONSE on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather.(LKO)
July 28, 2022 Filing 12 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB)
July 26, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 22, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to show cause why the cases referenced above should not be considered strikes against him per the terms of the PLRA, and why he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). In the alternative, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days. In the absence of either action by Plaintiff, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: August 15, 2022: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause or pay fees. Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery, Filing No. #7 , is denied as premature. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
July 12, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Consent on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 12, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Discovery on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 11, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the For m AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: August 4, 2022: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party as directed) (ADB)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
June 30, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
June 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tia Anderson, Bryan West Hospital Adult Psychiatric Unit, Doctor Sadiki, Lasting Hope Recovery Center Doctor Sha, M.D., Records Department of Health & Human Services, Thresa last name unknown, and Vital Records of Nebraska filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lightfeather v. Records Department of Health & Human Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Edward Lightfeather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Records Department of Health & Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thresa last name unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tia Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vital Records of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan West Hospital Adult Psychiatric Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor Sadiki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lasting Hope Recovery Center Doctor Sha, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?