Lightfeather v. Ben et al
| Austin Edward Lightfeather |
| Cyrus Ben, Chief Wahoo Choctaw Nation, Taylor Daro, Kimberly Dumass, Tia Anderson, Pierce L. Bower, Drue L. Bower, Brenda Stinson, Jay Stinson, Kamala Harris, Scott Harris and Joe Biden |
| 8:2022cv00244 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - This case is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum and Order entered on this date. Any notice of appeal filed by Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Lightfeather will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Lightfeather's Motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. #4 ; Filing No. #6 , are denied. This case is dismissed without prejudice and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Any notice of appeal filed by Lightfeather must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Lightfeather will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather.(LKO) |
| Filing 8 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (ADB) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (LKO) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (MKR) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to show cause why the cases referenced above should not be considered strikes against him per the terms of the PLRA, and why he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). In the alternative, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days. In the absence of either action by Plaintiff, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 8/15/2022: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause or pay fees) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather.(LRM) |
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tia Anderson, Cyrus Ben, Joe Biden, Drue L. Bower, Pierce L. Bower, Chief Wahoo Choctaw Nation, Taylor Daro, Kimberly Dumass, Kamala Harris, Scott Harris, Brenda Stinson and Jay Stinson; no Summons(es) issued; filed on behalf of Plaintiff Austin Edward Lightfeather. (MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
