Due v. Hoffman et al
Randall David Due |
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson |
8:2022cv00251 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Robert F Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 9 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - Pursuant to the presiding judges order of recusal (Filing No. #8 ) and in the interest of judicial economy, this case is reassigned to Chief District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and remains assigned to the pro se docket for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 8 ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the Court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a), which states: "Any... judge... of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." Upon review of the parties and the record in the above-designated case, the undersigned judge shall, and hereby does, recuse himself from the above-designated case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a). Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO) |
Filing 7 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LRM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Pro Se Docket assigned. (LRM) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00102. Original electronic file received. |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 7/12/2022. (dht) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to District of Nebraska. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 7/26/2022. (dht) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE.(bcl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/5/2022: #1 Envelope) (bcl). [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN, filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.