Due v. Hoffman et al
Randall David Due |
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson |
8:2022cv00251 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Robert F Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
Filing 6 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Pro Se Docket assigned. (LRM) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00102. Original electronic file received. |
|
Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to District of Nebraska. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 7/26/2022. (dht) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE.(bcl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/5/2022: #1 Envelope) (bcl). [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN, filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.