Due v. Dawson et al
Randall David Due |
Robert T. Dawson, Matthew R. Hoffman and Brian D. Bailey |
8:2022cv00252 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Robert F Rossiter |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
Filing 6 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Pro Se Docket assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00103. Original electronic file received. |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dht) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRIAN D BAILEY, ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dht) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.