Mills v. Treasury Retail Security Services et al
Plaintiff: Jon A. Mills
Defendant: Treasury Retail Security Services and Treasury Direct Services
Case Number: 8:2022cv00274
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for miscellaneous relief on behalf of Plaintiff Jon A. Mills. (ADB)
August 31, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION (An Application) for Immediate Preventative Relief Order on behalf of Plaintiff Jon A. Mills.(MKR)
August 10, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION on behalf of Plaintiff Jon A. Mills.(TCL)
August 9, 2022 Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(TCL) (MKR). Modified on 8/15/2022 to reflect Deficiency Satisfied on 8/15/2022 (MKR).
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
August 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jon A. Mills.(MKR) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/15/2022: #1 Corrected Document) (MKR).
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 RESTRICTED COMPLAINT against Treasury Direct Services and Treasury Retail Security Services; no Summons issued, filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jon A. Mills. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (Attachments: #1 Complaint Attachment # 1, #2 Complaint Attachment # 2, #3 Complaint Attachment # 3, #4 Complaint Attachment # 4)(MKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mills v. Treasury Retail Security Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jon A. Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Treasury Retail Security Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Treasury Direct Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?