Yah v. The City of Omaha et al
M, A, Yah |
City of Omaha, Aaron Hanson and Omaha Police Department |
8:2022cv00375 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Robert F Rossiter |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AMENDED TEXT NOTICE REGARDING Brief in Support of Motion to Dismss #8 . This filing does not contain a Certificate of Compliance as required by NECivR 7.1(d)(3). This notice is for your information for future filings.(MLF) |
Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING. This filing does not contain a Certificate of Compliance as required by NECivR 7.1(d)(3). This notice is for your information for future filings.(MLF) |
Filing 8 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #7 by Attorney Tyler Hiipakka on behalf of Defendants City of Omaha, Aaron Hanson, Omaha Police Department.(Hiipakka, Tyler) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Tyler Hiipakka on behalf of Defendants City of Omaha, Aaron Hanson, Omaha Police Department.(Hiipakka, Tyler) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants' answers or responses to Plaintiff's complaint shall be filed on or before December 8, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION on behalf of Plaintiff M, A, Yah. (LKO) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Tyler Hiipakka on behalf of Defendants City of Omaha, Aaron Hanson, Omaha Police Department.(Hiipakka, Tyler) |
Remark - Public: A mistake occurred at case opening and Plaintiff M,A, Yah was assigned electronic filing access in CM/ECF. Plaintiff has not consented to electronic filing in this case and electronic filing rights have been removed from Plaintiff M,A, Yah. (JLS) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (MKR) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Defendants from District Court of Douglas County of Nebraska, Case number CI 22-3390 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4744879) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Tyler Hiipakka on behalf of Omaha Police Department, City of Omaha, Aaron Hanson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- Order of Dismissal, #3 Exhibit 3 - Order of Reinstatement)(Hiipakka, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.