Russell v. Postmaster General Louis Dejoy
| Sonia Russell |
| Postmaster General Louis Dejoy |
| 8:2022cv00417 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| John M Gerrard |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER Pursuant to the supervising pro se judge's order of February 2, 2023 (Filing No. 6 ), this case is reassigned to District Judge John M. Gerrard for disposition and Magistrate Michael D. Nelson for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER - The filing fee has been paid in this case. At the direction of the Court, this case is removed from the pro se docket. The clerk's office shall randomly assign new judges to this case and request a reassignment order from the Chief Judge. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LRM)
|
| FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Plaintiff Sonia Russell. Receipt number 8065908, in the amount of $ 402.00. (receipt mailed to pro se party) (ADB) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. #2 , is denied. Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in this matter being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: January 19, 2023: deadline for Plaintiff to pay $402.00 filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Sonia Russell.(LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Postmaster General Louis Dejoy filed on behalf of Sonia Russell. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Russell v. Postmaster General Louis Dejoy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sonia Russell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Postmaster General Louis Dejoy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
