DeGeer v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
| Todd DeGeer |
| Union Pacific Railroad Co. |
| 8:2023cv00010 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Charles Delbridge by Attorney Charles A. Delbridge on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer.(Delbridge, Charles) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Jacob Harksen on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer (Harksen, Jacob) |
Filing 19
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - In accordance with the Order entered today (Filing No. 18), a random draw was conducted in this matter, and this case is reassigned to Chief District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (SLP)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting Union Pacific Railroad's Co's #6 Motion for Reassignment. The Clerk of Court is directed to randomly redraw the Article III district judge and reassign as necessary. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (MKR)
|
| Filing 17 DECLARATION regarding MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant's Statute of Limitations Defense #14 , Statement, #16 , Brief #15 by Attorney Charles A. Delbridge on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - First Amended Complaint, Harris v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 8:16-cv-381 ECF No. 20 (D. Neb.), #2 Exhibit 2 - Pls. Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Class Certification, Harris, No. 8:16-cv-381 ECF No. 241, #3 Exhibit 3 - Class Declarations, Harris, No. 8:16-cv-381 ECF No. 248-33, #4 Exhibit 4 - 2020.05.01 Letter from David Schlesinger to EEOC regarding Union Pacific Railroad Company, #5 Exhibit 5 - 2020.03.06 Todd Degeer EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2023.01.05 EEOC Right to Sue Letter, #7 Exhibit 7 - Compilation of Defendants written discovery responses from Harris v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 8:16-cv-381 (D. Neb.) highlighted and bookmarked for the Courts convenience, #8 Exhibit 8 - 2017.07.07 Email from Scott Moore to Nichols Kaster., #9 Exhibit 9 - Def.s Fourth Supp. Answers to Interrogs, Set 1, #10 Exhibit 10 - Second Class List, #11 Exhibit 11 - 2018.02.25 Email from Allison Balus to Nichols Kaster, #12 Exhibit 12 - Third Class List, #13 Exhibit 13 - Def.s Fifth Supp. Answers to Interrogs, Set 1, #14 Exhibit 14 - 2018.04.09 Letter from Allison Balus to Nichols Kaster, #15 Exhibit 15 - Pls. Reply in Supp. of Mot. for Class Certification, Harris, No. 8:16-cv-381 ECF No. 289, #16 Exhibit 16 - Pl.s Second Am. Answers to Def.s Second Interrogs, #17 Exhibit 17 - Def.s Br. in Oppn to Mot. for Class Certification, Harris, No. 8:16-cv-381 ECF No. 259, #18 Exhibit 18 - 2019.02.07 Letter from James Kaster to Defense Counsel, #19 Exhibit 19 - Union Pacifics Pet. For Permission to Appeal, Harris, No. 19-8006 (8th Cir. Feb. 20, 2019), #20 Exhibit 20 - Opening Br. for Appellant, Harris, No. 19-1514 (8th Cir. Apr. 25, 2019), #21 Exhibit 21 - 2021.01.05 Letter from James Kaster to Defense Counsel, #22 Exhibit 22 - Def.s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., Blankinship v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. CV-21-00072-TUC-RM (D. Ariz.), #23 Exhibit 23 - Def.s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., Donahue v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 21-cv-00448-MMC (N.D. Cal.), #24 Exhibit 24 - Def.s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., DeFries v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:21-cv-00205-SB (D. Or.), #25 Exhibit 25 - Def.s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., Smithson v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. SA-21-CV-01225-XR (W.D. Tex.), #26 Exhibit 26 - Def.s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., Zaragoza v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. EP-21-CV-287-KC (W.D. Tex.))(Delbridge, Charles) |
| Filing 16 STATEMENT regarding: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant's Statute of Limitations Defense #14 Plaintiff Statement of Undisputed Facts In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Attorney Charles A. Delbridge on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer.(Delbridge, Charles) |
| Filing 15 BRIEF in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant's Statute of Limitations Defense #14 by Attorney Charles A. Delbridge on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer.(Delbridge, Charles) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant's Statute of Limitations Defense by Attorney Charles A. Delbridge on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer.(Delbridge, Charles) |
| Filing 13 REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION Reassignment of Case Directed to Chief Judge Pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(2) #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION regarding Response #11 by Attorney Lucas J. Kaster on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendant Union Pacifics Motion & Brief for Summary Judgment in the Jimmy Smithson v Union Pacific Railroad Company matter Case No. 5:21-cv-01225-XR filed on December 19, 2022, #2 Exhibit 2 - Defendant Union Pacifics Motion & Brief for Summary Judgment in the Robert Zaragoza v Union Pacific Railroad Company matter, Case No. 3:21-cv-287-KC filed on December 19, 2022)(Kaster, Lucas) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE regarding MOTION Reassignment of Case Directed to Chief Judge Pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(2) #6 by Attorney Lucas J. Kaster on behalf of Plaintiff Todd DeGeer.(Kaster, Lucas) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Co.. by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corporation.(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TCL) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF in support of MOTION Reassignment of Case Directed to Chief Judge Pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(2) #6 by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Reassignment of Case Directed to Chief Judge Pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(2) by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. on 1/9/2023. (Kaster, James) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Union Pacific Railroad Co. regarding Complaint #1 . (Kaster, James) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4781080), by Attorney James H. Kaster on behalf of Todd DeGeer(Kaster, James) |
| Remark - Public (Related Case): This notice serves to advise the parties that a plaintiff noted this case as related to another pending or closed case in this court. If a case is noted as related on the cover sheet or case opening screen when filed, the clerk assigns it to the district judge who handled the earlier pending or closed case. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B). Any challenge to operation of this rule must be made pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(7). (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
