Langford v. Father Flanagan's Boys Home
| Howard L. Langford |
| Father Flanagan's Boys Home and Father Flanagan's Boys' Home |
| 8:2023cv00012 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that plaintiff Howard L. Langford's Motion in Opposition to Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446 (Filing No. #7 ) is denied. Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys' Homes Partial Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. #4 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Langford's claims for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000(e) et seq., are dismissed with prejudice. The motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
| Filing 8 REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss) #4 by Attorney Christopher M. Schmidt on behalf of Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.(Schmidt, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 MOTION on behalf of Plaintiff Howard L. Langford. (LKO) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Christopher M. Schmidt on behalf of Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.(Schmidt, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF in support of MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss) #4 by Attorney Christopher M. Schmidt on behalf of Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.(Schmidt, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss) by Attorney Christopher M. Schmidt on behalf of Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.(Schmidt, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Father Flanagan's Boys Home. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(JES) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Howard L. Langford from District Court of Douglas County, Nebrask, Case number CI 22 9327 (Filing fee $402, receipt number 8065748) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Christopher M. Schmidt on behalf of Father Flanagan's Boys Home(Schmidt, Christopher) Modified on 1/12/2023 to include the receipt number. (JES). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
