Allen v. Morello
| Arthur R. Allen |
| Bernard J. Morello |
| 8:2023cv00094 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: The parties did not consent, in writing, to disposition of the case by a magistrate judge. Pursuant to NEGenR.1.4(a)(3)(C)(ii). Case reassigned to Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. Ordered by Judge Brian C. Buescher. Modified on 4/26/2023 to reflect correct text (NMW).
|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Andrew T. Schlosser on behalf of Defendant Bernard J. Morello.(Schlosser, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF in support of FINAL MOTION to Remand #6 by Attorney John P. Farrell on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur R. Allen.(Farrell, John) |
| Filing 6 FINAL MOTION to Remand by Attorney John P. Farrell on behalf of Plaintiff Arthur R. Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appraisal, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Appraiser)(Farrell, John) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER - CONSENT Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 4/26/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (MKR)
|
|
Filing 4
RESTRICTED TELEPHONE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS AND ORDER. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
|
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 Schlosser, Andrew by Bernard J. Morello (Schlosser, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Arthur R Allen from District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, Case number CI 23-1195 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4823758) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Andrew T. Schlosser on behalf of Bernard J. Morello (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Schlosser, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Morello | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arthur R. Allen | |
| Represented By: | John P. Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bernard J. Morello | |
| Represented By: | Andrew T. Schlosser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
