Jordan v. Omaha Public Power District et al
| Derrell K. Jordan |
| Omaha Public Power District and Aptim Government Solutions, LLC |
| 8:2023cv00133 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Patrick J. Barrett on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Power District.(Barrett, Patrick) |
| Filing 10 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Omaha Public Power District. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TJM) |
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant Omaha Public Power District shall file an answer or other responsive pleading on or before July 3, 2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TMM)
|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Patrick J. Barrett on behalf of Defendant Omaha Public Power District.(Barrett, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Aptim Corp. (Delaware), Corporate Parent Aptim Holding Corp (Delaware), Corporate Parent Aptim Holdings LLC (Delaware) for Aptim Government Solutions, LLC. by Attorney Tara A. Stingley on behalf of Defendants Aptim Government Solutions, LLC, Aptim Corp. (Delaware), Aptim Holding Corp (Delaware), Aptim Holdings LLC (Delaware).(Stingley, Tara) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Aptim Government Solutions, LLC (Stingley, Tara) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendants Aptim Government Solutions, LLC and Omaha Public Power District. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Omaha Public Power District regarding Complaint, #1 . (Werth, Spencer) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Aptim Government Solutions, LLC regarding Complaint, #1 . (Werth, Spencer) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand Derrell K. Jordan against Aptim Government Solutions, LLC, Omaha Public Power District ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4836703), by Attorney Spencer W. Werth on behalf of Derrell K. Jordan(Werth, Spencer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
